Re: CVE-2018-1058

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Lizeth Solis Aramayo <lizeth(dot)solis(at)elfec(dot)bo>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CVE-2018-1058
Date: 2019-10-16 22:31:38
Message-ID: a0f3f024-afae-5a46-8343-4397d6f8efe2@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/16/19 1:05 PM, Lizeth Solis Aramayo wrote:
> What commands did you use to dump the 9.6.15 version and restore to the
> 9.6.5 version?
>
> Pg_dump -p 5433 -U postgres -Fc -d dbkerp -n param > param.dump
> And
> Pg_restore -p 5432 -U postgres -d dbkerp param.dump
>
>
> Server with pg_dump is Linux red hat 7.6
>
> Server with pg_restore is linux red hat 6.5
>
>
> In both servers I have postgresql 9.6, but in pg_dump is 9.6.15, and in pg_restore is 9.6.5.
>
>
> The pg_dump is correct, everything goes ok., but when I do the pg_restore I gota n error : pg_restore: [archiver] unsupported version (1.13) in file header

Forgot a fourth option:

4) Use the 9.6.15 pg_restore to restore the 9.6.15 pg_dump to the 9.6.5
database.

>
>
> I searched solutions, and I found that I can apply a patch CVE-2018-1058, but I don¡t know how.
> How to download, and install, I dont find documents about it.
>
> he reason why you can't upgrade the 9.6.5 to 9.6.15? I dont know how.
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erwin Brandstetter 2019-10-17 03:09:17 Can functions containing a CTE be PARALLEL SAFE?
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2019-10-16 22:14:29 Re: Changing PK on replicated database