From: | "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "PostgreSQL General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: fascinating article on postgresql mailing lists |
Date: | 2013-02-11 19:17:03 |
Message-ID: | a05666d8-30a9-4aae-aaa2-2d839acbe292@mm |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Vincent Veyron wrote:
> I find it strange that
>
> 'Probability that a new thread gets a response'
>
> sits below 60% for the 'general' list
This seems indeed too low.
I happen to collect these messages in a database since mid-2005. As a point
of comparison, the numbers I get until today for pgsql-general are 3348
messages that appear to be outside of any thread (no "In-Reply-To" field or
"References" field that points to it, and subject does not start with "Re:"),
the total number of messages being 110233, in 19855 distinct threads.
So at least in this time period, I can't see how it could be said that
there's a 40% probability of not getting a reply. If we consider that there
are 3348 failed attempts at spawning a thread vs 19855 successful attempts,
the ratio would be about 6:1, or a 17% probability of getting no public
response.
Best regards,
--
Daniel
PostgreSQL-powered mail user agent and storage: http://www.manitou-mail.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Satori | 2013-02-11 19:35:10 | Re: fascinating article on postgresql mailing lists |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-02-11 18:50:14 | Re: Cache lookup failed for relation |