From: | Alexander Law <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PDF building with FOP |
Date: | 2017-03-11 07:22:51 |
Message-ID: | a0523587-2f01-4e16-4ef7-9fd7a475d3d5@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Hello Alvaro,
11.03.2017 06:19, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> - Does the output look OK?
> It looks generally sane in a very quick skim, modulo the problems we've
> always had with PDFs, such as tables 9-44 and 9-45 being completely
> unusable.
We at postgrespro added custom XSL (see pg-customize-fo.xsl in
patches/xml in pg-doc.check.tar.bz2 attached to
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/449e34c4-9cc8-d17d-5ebe-be92b4c0a87a%40gmail.com)
to get long text wrapped in the table cells.
Look at http://repo.postgrespro.ru/doc/pgpro/9.6/en/postgres-A4-fop.pdf
(pages 224-228)
There are a few places where long strings still should be broken
manually (with &zwsp;) but the majority of the long string issues fixed
automatically with this xsl.
Best regards,
Alexander
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Law | 2017-03-11 07:38:13 | Re: PDF building with FOP |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-03-11 05:31:42 | Re: PDF building with FOP |