From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Date: | 2024-11-19 12:50:50 |
Message-ID: | ZzyJqm784HsN3JiI@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 08:42:35PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 08:29:10PM -0500, Corey Huinker wrote:
> > That's not a great surprise for group 6, but I have to believe that group is
> > smaller than group 5, and it's definitely smaller than the group of users that
> > need to upgrade.
>
> Again, a clean API is the goal, not surprise calculus.
Maybe I was too harsh. "Surprise calculus" is fine, but only after we
have an API that will be clearly understood by new users. We have to
assume that in the long run new users will use this API more than
existing users.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means
"Am I going to die soon?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-11-19 12:57:00 | Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart |
Previous Message | torikoshia | 2024-11-19 12:40:30 | Re: Add reject_limit option to file_fdw |