| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r) |
| Date: | 2024-11-15 07:49:26 |
| Message-ID: | Zzb9BqUxuXWk34Vt@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 06:46:52AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Makes sense even if that looks "more difficult" to read.
I don't think it's that "bad".
> which is adding a "." at the end of single line comments (as the few already
> part of this file don't do so).
I did so after looking at the surroundings. One way or the other is
fine by me as long as we're consistent.
I still need to have a second look. For now, let's wait a bit, in
case there are any comments.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2024-11-15 08:09:53 | Re: JIT: Remove some unnecessary instructions. |
| Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-11-15 06:46:52 | Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r) |