Re: Proposal for Updating CRC32C with AVX-512 Algorithm.

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: "Devulapalli, Raghuveer" <raghuveer(dot)devulapalli(at)intel(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Shankaran, Akash" <akash(dot)shankaran(at)intel(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal for Updating CRC32C with AVX-512 Algorithm.
Date: 2024-11-07 16:10:24
Message-ID: ZyzmcF5pzuArPppv@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:05:14AM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2024-10-30 21:03:20 +0000, Devulapalli, Raghuveer wrote:
>> From a495124ee42cb8f9f206f719b9f2235aff715963 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Nathan Bossart <nathan(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:57:55 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH v6 5/6] use __attribute__((target(...))) for AVX-512 stuff
>
> Huh, so now we're undoing a bunch of stuff done earlier. Makes this series
> pretty hard to review.

I'm planning to commit this one very soon (it's being tracked in a separate
thread [0]), so this patch series will need rebasing, anyway. I think we
should use __attribute__((target(...))) right away for $SUBJECT instead of
undoing stuff in later patches.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/ZywlZzPcPnlqKvt5%40nathan

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2024-11-07 16:12:37 Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2024-11-07 16:09:47 Re: Commit Timestamp and LSN Inversion issue