From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r) |
Date: | 2024-11-06 11:40:06 |
Message-ID: | ZytVlmPJSRzmu5nS@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 01:44:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Should the last loop check only 1 byte at a time or should this stuff
> include one more step before the last one you wrote to do a couple of
> checks with size_t? That may matter for areas small enough (len <
> sizeof(size_t) * 8) causing the second step to not be taken, but large
> enough (len > sizeof(size_t)) to apply a couple of size_t checks per
> loop.
Do you mean add:
"
for (; p < aligned_end; p += sizeof(size_t))
{
if (*(size_t *)p != 0)
return false;
}
"
just before the last loop?
If so, I did a few tests and did not see any major improvements. So, I thought
it's simpler to not add more code in this inline function in v7 shared up-thread.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2024-11-06 12:18:32 | Re: Disallow UPDATE/DELETE on table with unpublished generated column as REPLICA IDENTITY |
Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-11-06 11:38:30 | Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r) |