Re: small pg_combinebackup improvements

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: small pg_combinebackup improvements
Date: 2024-11-01 08:01:34
Message-ID: ZySK3peNwtld6c4J@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:06:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:41 AM Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I'm not sure about 0001 but I think 0002 deserves a back patch as I think it fits
> > into the "low-risk fixes" category [0].
>
> I'm inclined to back-patch both, then. We might have more small fixes
> and they'll be less risky to back-patch if we back-patch them all.

Yeah, that makes fully sense. +1 to back-patch both then.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2024-11-01 08:07:00 Re: Wrong result when enable_partitionwise_join is on if collation of PartitionKey and Column is different.
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2024-11-01 07:57:03 RE: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns