Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r)
Date: 2024-10-31 06:17:23
Message-ID: ZyMg8zXEfJZ74ZBX@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 05:52:49AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> That makes sense to me, done that way in the attached.

Seems kind of OK seen from here. I am wondering if others more
comments about the name of the macro, its location, the fact that we
still have pagebytes in bufpage.c, etc.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-31 06:32:39 Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-31 05:56:37 Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression