| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andreas(at)proxel(dot)se" <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: general purpose array_sort |
| Date: | 2024-11-08 00:01:20 |
| Message-ID: | Zy1U0OGjVdHOYqTu@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 09:29:05AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Yes, I think that case needs to error out. It seems best to identify
> the ordering operator before you decide whether or not you have >1
> element.
+1.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Fan | 2024-11-08 00:31:12 | Re: Deleting older versions in unique indexes to avoid page splits |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-11-07 23:13:32 | Re: New "single" COPY format |