From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Missing installation of Kerberos.pm and AdjustUpgrade.pm |
Date: | 2024-10-24 05:51:05 |
Message-ID: | ZxngSWiXVSpJerGW@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:46:23PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I cannot say much in favor of Kerberos.pm, but AdjustUpgrade.pm could
> be really useful IMO when running the main regression test suite in an
> out-of-core module for upgrade scenarios. Not to mention that it
> includes a set of filtering regexes that are rather generic.
While catching up with some other thing, I've been reminded that this
has not been addressed. Any objections if I were to apply the
attached to add install and uninstall rules for Kerberos.pm and
AdjustUpgrade.pm?
If people would prefer a backpatch, please let me know.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Add-rules-for-Kerberos.pm-and-AdjustUpgrade.pm.patch | text/x-diff | 2.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rahila Syed | 2024-10-24 05:59:46 | Re: Enhancing Memory Context Statistics Reporting |
Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2024-10-24 05:00:09 | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |