Re: Add isolation test template in injection_points for wait/wakeup/detach

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add isolation test template in injection_points for wait/wakeup/detach
Date: 2024-10-18 09:16:50
Message-ID: ZxIngooeKiWLu0X_@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 07:58:26AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> I think that it makes sense to "expose" the basics in a dedicated test.
>
> I thought that template.spec could have been another "naming" option but
> basic.spec is better I think.

I am not wedded to the name I have proposed. No comment on my naming
sense..

> +# Detach before wait does not cause a wait.
>
> What about?
>
> Detach before wait does not cause a wait (and so wakeup produces an error)

Sure, why not.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2024-10-18 09:32:10 Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers?
Previous Message Stepan Neretin 2024-10-18 09:07:25 Re: Recovery of .partial WAL segments