Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable)
Date: 2024-10-17 23:08:55
Message-ID: ZxGZB2d-RttHwmlt@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:54:45AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Here is a new version of the patch set with this #ifdef added. I plan to
> give each of the code paths adjusted by 0001 a closer look, but otherwise
> I'm hoping to commit these soon.

0002 and 0003 look sane enough to me as shaped. I'd need to spend a
few more hours on 0001 if I were to do a second round on it, but you
don't really need a second opinion, do you? :D
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-10-17 23:16:11 Re: UUID v7
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-17 22:52:59 Re: [BUG FIX] Fix validation of COPY options FORCE_NOT_NULL/FORCE_NULL