Re: Assertion failure when autovacuum drops orphan temp indexes.

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Stepan Neretin <sndcppg(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assertion failure when autovacuum drops orphan temp indexes.
Date: 2024-10-28 15:12:59
Message-ID: Zx-p-1hxufrvUTPM@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 09:36:38PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestion. IMHO I'm not sure we need to have a
> regression test for this bug as it's just an oversight of recently
> committed code.

Agreed. FWIW cfbot seems to catch this already (CTRL+F for "index_drop" in
the highlights page [0]), and I saw it on my laptop shortly after the issue
was reported.

[0] http://cfbot.cputube.org/highlights/all.html

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-10-28 15:16:54 Re: Alias of VALUES RTE in explain plan
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-10-28 15:08:31 Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r)