Re: Use MAX_PARALLEL_WORKER_LIMIT consistently in guc_tables.c

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Use MAX_PARALLEL_WORKER_LIMIT consistently in guc_tables.c
Date: 2024-10-09 23:51:40
Message-ID: ZwcXDMFwg9BG8wzM@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 10:28:05PM +0800, Zhang Mingli wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2024 at 20:35 +0800, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm(at)gmail(dot)com>, wrote:
>> PFA a trivial one-line patch that makes that a bit more consistent.
>
> LGTM.

Makes sense to me as well. Thanks for the patch.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-10 00:01:47 Re: Allow default \watch interval in psql to be configured
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-09 23:49:44 Re: \watch 0 or \watch 0.00001 doesn't do what I want