Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes
Date: 2024-10-08 02:03:34
Message-ID: ZwSS9lyOFYRGABEd@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 05:34:25PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I got to do the detailed benchmarking on the latest version of the patch
> series, so here's the results. My goal was to better understand the
> impact of each patch individually - especially the two parts introduced
> by Matthias, but not only - so I ran the test on a build with each fo
> the 0001-0009 patches.

_gin_parallel_build_main() is introduced in 0001. Please make sure to
pass down a query ID.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-08 02:05:59 Re: WIP: parallel GiST index builds
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-08 02:01:17 Re: Partition-wise join with whole row vars