Re: Should rolpassword be toastable?

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should rolpassword be toastable?
Date: 2024-10-07 15:58:54
Message-ID: ZwQFPvJxrKsILykX@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Committed with the limit set to 512 bytes. We have plenty of time to
adjust this limit as needed before it takes effect in v18.

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-10-07 16:02:10 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2024-10-07 15:57:36 Re: On disable_cost