| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable) |
| Date: | 2024-10-14 20:02:22 |
| Message-ID: | Zw14zoBCg-zGu1mi@nathan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:50:52PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> 0002 could probably use some more commentary, but otherwise I think it is
> in decent shape. You (Michael) seem to be implying that I should
> back-patch the actual fixes and only apply the new assertions to v18. Am I
> understanding you correctly?
Here is a reorganized patch set. 0001 would be back-patched, but the
others would only be applied to v18.
--
nathan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-Ensure-we-have-a-snapshot-when-updating-various-s.patch | text/plain | 5.5 KB |
| v3-0002-Introduce-RelationGetToastRelid-macro.patch | text/plain | 12.8 KB |
| v3-0003-Assert-that-we-have-a-valid-snapshot-if-we-might-.patch | text/plain | 2.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2024-10-14 20:05:42 | Make foreach_ptr macro work in C++ extensions |
| Previous Message | Kirill Reshke | 2024-10-14 19:59:11 | Re: Consider the number of columns in the sort cost model |