Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable)

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable)
Date: 2024-09-26 20:53:33
Message-ID: ZvXJzVHGvDFd2xmK@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 02:26:08PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 01:21:45PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 10:50:21AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>>> I carefully inspected all the code paths this patch touches, and I think
>>> I've got all the details right, but I would be grateful if someone else
>>> could take a look.
>>
>> No objections from here with putting the snapshots pops and pushes
>> outside the inner routines of reindex/drop concurrently, meaning that
>> ReindexRelationConcurrently(), DefineIndex() and index_drop() are fine
>> to do these operations.
>
> Great. I plan to push 0001 shortly.

Committed this one.

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-09-26 21:33:06 Re: MAINTAIN privilege -- what do we need to un-revert it?
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2024-09-26 20:17:03 micro-optimize nbtcompare.c routines