Re: pgsql: Implement pg_wal_replay_wait() stored procedure

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Implement pg_wal_replay_wait() stored procedure
Date: 2024-09-26 08:18:49
Message-ID: ZvUY6bfTwB0GsyzP@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Hi Alexander,

On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 06:22:21PM +0000, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Implement pg_wal_replay_wait() stored procedure
>
> pg_wal_replay_wait() is to be used on standby and specifies waiting for
> the specific WAL location to be replayed. This option is useful when
> the user makes some data changes on primary and needs a guarantee to see
> these changes are on standby.
>
> The queue of waiters is stored in the shared memory as an LSN-ordered pairing
> heap, where the waiter with the nearest LSN stays on the top. During
> the replay of WAL, waiters whose LSNs have already been replayed are deleted
> from the shared memory pairing heap and woken up by setting their latches.
>
> pg_wal_replay_wait() needs to wait without any snapshot held. Otherwise,
> the snapshot could prevent the replay of WAL records, implying a kind of
> self-deadlock. This is why it is only possible to implement
> pg_wal_replay_wait() as a procedure working without an active snapshot,
> not a function.
>
> Catversion is bumped.

I've spotted that this patch uses an OID that should not be used
during the development cycle:
+{ oid => '111',
+ descr => 'wait for the target LSN to be replayed on standby with an optional timeout',

Please use something in the 8000-9999 range, as required by
98eab30b93d5.

Thanks,
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2024-09-26 08:53:45 pgsql: Update oid for pg_wal_replay_wait() procedure
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-09-26 04:47:25 pgsql: tests: Restrict pg_locks queries in advisory_locks.sql to curren

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2024-09-26 08:48:35 Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-09-26 08:16:07 Re: Add has_large_object_privilege function