| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: installcheck-world concurrency issues |
| Date: | 2024-09-26 04:47:52 |
| Message-ID: | ZvTneMVPdsMYwTQE@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 11:24:46AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Corey (added in CC.), has noticed that the issue fixed by c3315a7 in
> 16~ for advisory locks is not complicated to reach, leading to
> failures in some of our automated internal stuff. A cherry-pick of
> c3315a7 works cleanly across 12~15. Would there be any objections if
> I were to backpatch this part down to 12?
>
> The problems fixed by 6a20b04 have not really been an issue here,
> hence I'd rather let things be as they are for the conflicting role
> names.
Hearing nothing, done.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yugo Nagata | 2024-09-26 05:19:21 | Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes |
| Previous Message | Tom Dunstan | 2024-09-26 03:57:54 | Re: CREATE INDEX regression in 17 RC1 or expected behavior? |