Re: Add parallel columns for pg_stat_statements

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add parallel columns for pg_stat_statements
Date: 2024-10-03 07:14:58
Message-ID: Zv5EciOgxvAUJ-S1@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:08:23PM +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> This patch was a bit discussed on [1], and with more details on [2]. It's
> based on another patch sent in 2022 (see [3]). It introduces seven new
> columns in pg_stat_statements:
>
> * parallelized_queries_planned, number of times the query has been planned
> to be parallelized,
> * parallelized_queries_launched, number of times the query has been
> executed with parallelization,

Comparing the numbers of workers planned and launched with the number
of times a query has been called and planned should provide a rather
good equivalent, no? I am not sure that these two are mandatory to
have.

> * parallelized_workers_planned, number of parallel workers planned for
> this query,
> * parallelized_workers_launched, number of parallel workers executed for
> this query,

Yep. Definitely OK with these two. There is an overlap with what
Benoit has sent here when it comes to publish this data to the
executor state:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/783bc7f7-659a-42fa-99dd-ee0565644e25@dalibo.com

> * parallelized_nodes, number of parallelized nodes,
> * parallelized_nodes_all_workers, number of parallelized nodes which had
> all requested workers,
>
> * parallelized_nodes_no_worker, number of parallelized nodes which had no
> requested workers.

I can see why you want to register this extra data on a node-basis,
but how does that help when it comes to tune the parallel GUCs? We
cannot control them at node level and the launched/planned ratio
offers an equivalent of that. Not exactly, but that's enough to get a
picture if there is a draught.

> A test script (test2.sql) is attached. You can execute it with "psql -Xef
> test2.sql your_database" (your_database should not contain a t1 table as it
> will be dropped and recreated).

Let's add proper regression tests instead, including
oldextversions.sql as this bumps the version of the module. See for
example the tests of 6fd5071909a2 that can force workers to spawn
for BRIN and btree queries, validating some of the stats published
here.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2024-10-03 07:16:43 Re: not null constraints, again
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-03 06:33:37 Re: Parallel workers stats in pg_stat_database