Re: per backend I/O statistics

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: per backend I/O statistics
Date: 2024-09-17 13:56:34
Message-ID: ZumKktat4RtHmxL/@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 04:47:51PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 17 Sept 2024 at 16:07, Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > So I think it's better to keep both functions as they behave differently.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Yes, that is correct. Sorry, you already had explained it and I had
> agreed with it but I forgot.

No problem at all! (I re-explained because I'm not always 100% sure that my
explanations are crystal clear ;-) )

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2024-09-17 14:11:47 Re: jsonb_strip_nulls with arrays?
Previous Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2024-09-17 13:47:51 Re: per backend I/O statistics