| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pgstattuple on Sequences: Seeking Community Feedback on Potential Patch |
| Date: | 2024-09-13 00:56:56 |
| Message-ID: | ZuON2ERKm9nvkOYo@nathan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 09:47:36AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 07:41:30PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Ugh, the buildfarm is unhappy with the new tests [0] [1]. Will fix.
>
> I'd suggest to switch the test to return a count() and make sure that
> one record exists. The data in the page does not really matter.
That's what I had in mind. I see that skimmer is failing with this error:
ERROR: cannot access temporary tables during a parallel operation
This makes sense because that machine has
debug_parallel_query/force_parallel_mode set to "regress", but this test
file has used a temporary table for a couple of years without issue...
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-09-13 01:42:09 | Re: Pgstattuple on Sequences: Seeking Community Feedback on Potential Patch |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-09-13 00:47:36 | Re: Pgstattuple on Sequences: Seeking Community Feedback on Potential Patch |