From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within a sane threshold |
Date: | 2024-09-20 13:27:47 |
Message-ID: | Zu14U-whwiOu86bc@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 10:11:00AM +0800, jian he wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:35 PM jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > The last time this was discussed, I think the conclusion was
> > > we should remove attndims and typndims entirely on the grounds
> > > that they're useless. I certainly don't see a point in adding
> > > more logic that could give the misleading impression that they
> > > mean something.
> > >
>
>
> attached patch removes attndims and typndims entirely.
> some tests skipped in my local my machine, not skipped are all OK.
I have been hoping for a patch links this because I feel the existence
of these system columns is deceptive since we don't honor them properly.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means
"Am I going to die soon?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-09-20 13:45:25 | Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree |
Previous Message | Marcos Pegoraro | 2024-09-20 12:36:51 | Why mention to Oracle ? |