Re: Typos in the code and README

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Typos in the code and README
Date: 2024-09-04 01:25:17
Message-ID: Zte2_cC1x7IW5_Ez@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 12:00:13PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I see your v17 typo fixes, and raise you a few more. Commit 31a98934d169 from
> just now contains 2 (out of 3) sets of typos introduced in v17 so they should
> follow along when you push the ones mentioned here.

Is that really mandatory? I tend to worry about back branches only
when this stuff is user-visible, like in the docs or error messages.
This opinion varies for each individual, of course. That's just my
lazy opinion.

CommitTSSLRU -> CommitTsSLRU is user-visible, showing up in
pg_stat_activity. Fixed this one with 08b9b9e043bb, as the tag for
17rc1 has been pushed.

Picking f747bc18f7f2 and 75c5231a00f3 on REL_17_STABLE leads to the
attached, I think, without the conflicts.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Fix-typos-and-grammar-in-code-comments-and-docs.patch text/x-diff 8.1 KB
0002-Fix-typos-in-code-comments-and-test-data.patch text/x-diff 4.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-09-04 01:41:49 Re: optimizing pg_upgrade's once-in-each-database steps
Previous Message Richard Guo 2024-09-04 01:16:39 Re: Wrong results with grouping sets