| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GUC names in messages |
| Date: | 2024-09-03 06:35:13 |
| Message-ID: | ZtauIWhZeILTG7aU@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 12:00:19PM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> Here is the rebased patch set v10*. Everything is the same as before
> except now there are only 7 patches instead of 8. The previous v9-0001
> ("bool") patch no longer exists because those changes are now already
> present in HEAD.
>
> I hope these might be pushed soon to avoid further rebasing.
0001~0004 could just be merged, they're the same thing, for different
GUC types. The consensus mentioned in 17974ec25946 makes that clear.
0007 is a good thing for translators, indeed.. I'll see about doing
something here, at least.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2024-09-03 06:37:49 | Re: per backend I/O statistics |
| Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-09-03 06:35:03 | Re: DOCS - pg_replication_slot . Fix the 'inactive_since' description |