| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR |
| Date: | 2024-09-03 06:27:37 |
| Message-ID: | ZtasWeaY0ALNCJt2@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 04:35:28AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> I understand why pg_xlog and pg_wal both need to be listed here, but I don't
> get why the proposed changes were "wrong". Or, are you saying that if for any
> reason PG_TBLSPC_DIR needs to be changed that would not work
> anymore?
Yes. Folks are not going to do that, but changing PG_TBLSPC_DIR would
change the decision-making when streaming from versions older than
v17 with clients tools from v18~.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-09-03 06:35:03 | Re: DOCS - pg_replication_slot . Fix the 'inactive_since' description |
| Previous Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2024-09-03 06:25:53 | Re: Expand applicability of aggregate's sortop optimization |