Re: 039_end_of_wal: error in "xl_tot_len zero" test

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anton Voloshin <a(dot)voloshin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 039_end_of_wal: error in "xl_tot_len zero" test
Date: 2024-08-29 14:34:32
Message-ID: ZtCG-KS__hEEpThn@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 01:55:27AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> The fix I propose to commit shortly is just the first of those new
>> lines, to homogenise the initial state. See attached. The previous
>> idea works too, I think, but this bigger hammer is more obviously
>> removing variation.
>
> +1, but a comment explaining the need for the pg_switch_wal call
> seems in order.

+1

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-08-29 14:49:44 Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2024-08-29 14:28:49 Re: Removing log_cnt from pg_sequence_read_tuple()