Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthew Kim <matthewkmkim(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping
Date: 2024-08-14 03:07:44
Message-ID: ZrwfgNyDXy99NUOS@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 04:46:34PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I've been preparing 0001 for commit. I've attached what I have so far.
>
> The main changes are the implementations of pg_abs_* and pg_neg_*. For the
> former, I've used abs()/i64abs() for the short/int implementations. For
> the latter, I've tried to use __builtin_sub_overflow() when possible, as
> that appears to produce slightly better code. When
> __builtin_sub_overflow() is not available, the values are upcasted before
> negation, and we check that result before casting to the return type. That
> approach more closely matches the surrounding functions. (One exception is
> pg_neg_u64_overflow() when we have neither HAVE__BUILTIN_OP_OVERFLOW nor
> HAVE_INT128. In that case, we have to hand-roll everything.)

And here's a new version of the patch in which I've attempted to fix the
silly mistakes.

--
nathan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v20-0001-Remove-dependence-on-integer-wrapping.patch text/plain 14.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2024-08-14 03:09:07 Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Previous Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2024-08-14 02:40:48 Re: query_id, pg_stat_activity, extended query protocol