From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | fix CRC algorithm in WAL reliability docs |
Date: | 2024-08-08 17:51:32 |
Message-ID: | ZrUFpLP-w2zTAHqq@nathan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I noticed that the "WAL reliability" documentation says that we use CRC-32
for WAL records and two-phase state files, but we've actually used CRC-32C
since v9.5 (commit 5028f22). I've attached a short patch to fix this that
I think should be back-patched to all supported versions.
I've attached a second patch that standardizes how we refer to these kinds
of algorithms in our docs. Specifically, it adds dashes (e.g., "CRC-32C"
instead of "CRC32C"). Wikipedia uses this style pretty consistently [0]
[1] [2], and so I think we should, too. I don't think this one needs to be
back-patched.
Thoughts?
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-1
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_redundancy_check
--
nathan
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-0001-note-correct-CRC-algorithm-in-WAL-reliability-doc.patch | text/plain | 1.2 KB |
v1-0002-standardize-style-of-CRC-SHA-algorithms-in-docs.patch | text/plain | 2.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2024-08-08 18:22:28 | Re: Virtual generated columns |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-08-08 17:42:55 | Re: Enable data checksums by default |