| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted |
| Date: | 2024-08-07 14:36:59 |
| Message-ID: | ZrOGi8RZTSHxTq9W@nathan |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 06:00:53AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> + SleepEx((microsec < 500 ? 1 : (microsec + 500) / 1000), FALSE);
I think this deserves a comment.
> +#define INSTR_TIME_ADD_MICROSEC(x,t) \
> + ((x).ticks += t * NS_PER_US)
I'd add parentheses around "t" to ensure any expressions given as "t" are
evaluated first.
Also, do we need to worry about overflow here? It looks like the rest of
instr_time.h is oblivious about overflow, so maybe this is better discussed
in a separate thread...
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vitaly Davydov | 2024-08-07 14:37:39 | Re: Fsync (flush) all inserted WAL records |
| Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-08-07 14:23:41 | Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted |