| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | SAMEER KUMAR <sameer(dot)kasi200x(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding clarification to description of IPC wait events XactGroupUpdate and ProcArrayGroupUpdate |
| Date: | 2024-08-14 20:00:15 |
| Message-ID: | Zr0MzxPtCL16NWk8@nathan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:38:49PM +0800, SAMEER KUMAR wrote:
> Yes, while reviewing the history of changes, I too noticed the same. The
> documentation of older versions (v12 [1]) still has old descriptions.
After reading the related threads and code, I'm inclined to agree that this
is a mistake, or at least that the current wording is likely to mislead
folks into thinking it has something to do with parallel query. I noticed
that your patch changed a few things in the description, but IMHO we should
keep the fix focused, i.e., just replace "end of a parallel operation" with
"transaction end." I've attached a modified version of the patch with this
change.
--
nathan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Fix-a-couple-of-wait-event-descriptions.patch | text/plain | 2.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2024-08-14 20:09:06 | Re: AIX support |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-08-14 19:38:59 | Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping |