Re: Flush pgstats file during checkpoints

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Flush pgstats file during checkpoints
Date: 2024-07-30 08:53:48
Message-ID: ZqiqHB+F36dMdURy@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 03:25:31PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 04:46:17AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > Thanks! 0001 attached is v4-0001-Revert-Test-that-vacuum-removes-tuples-older-than.patch
> > so I guess you did not attached the right one.
>
> I did attach the right set of patches, please ignore 0001 entirely:
> the patch series is made of three patches, beginning with 0002 :)

Yeah, saw that ;-)

> > Looking at 0002:
> >
> > if (!read_chunk(fpin, ptr, info->shared_data_len))
> > + {
> > + elog(WARNING, "could not read data of stats kind %d for entry of type %c",
> > + kind, t);
> >
> > Nit: what about to include the "info->shared_data_len" value in the WARNING?
>
> Good idea, so added.

Thanks!

> > Looking at 0003: LGTM
> > Looking at 0004: LGTM
>
> Thanks. Attached are the two remaining patches, for now. I'm
> planning to get back to these in a few days.

Did a quick check and still LGTM.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2024-07-30 09:05:56 Re: WIP: parallel GiST index builds
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2024-07-30 08:41:40 Re: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication