On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 01:33:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm a bit concerned about this on two grounds:
>
> 1. Is it a win for DBs with not so many functions?
>
> 2. On the other end of the scale, if you've got a *boatload* of
> functions, what does it do to pg_dump's memory requirements?
> I'm recalling my days at Salesforce, where they had quite a few
> thousand pl/pgsql functions totalling very many megabytes of source
> text. (Don't recall precise numbers offhand, and they'd be obsolete
> by now even if I did.)
>
> I'm not sure that the results you're showing justify taking any
> risk here.
Hm. I think this is sufficient reason to withdraw this patch on the spot.
--
nathan