Re: improve performance of pg_dump with many sequences

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: improve performance of pg_dump with many sequences
Date: 2024-07-17 03:23:08
Message-ID: Zpc5HGb7yDfTNDy5@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 11:30:04AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yeah, I have bumped on the same issue. In the long term, I also think
> that we'd better have pg_sequence_last_value() return a row with
> is_called and the value scanned. As you say, it won't help except
> when upgrading from versions of Postgres that are at least to v18,
> assuming that this change gets in the tree, but that would be much
> better in the long term and time flies fast.

AFAICT pg_sequence_last_value() is basically an undocumented internal
function only really intended for use by the pg_sequences system view, so
changing the function like this for v18 might not be out of the question.
Otherwise, I think we'd have to create a strikingly similar function with
slightly different behavior, which would be a bizarre place to end up.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2024-07-17 03:28:58 Re: Expand applicability of aggregate's sortop optimization
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2024-07-17 03:17:54 Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping