Re: Add on_error and log_verbosity options to file_fdw

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add on_error and log_verbosity options to file_fdw
Date: 2024-07-22 23:57:37
Message-ID: Zp7x8Y-SpbkZtpE-@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 03:07:46PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I'm slightly concerned that users might not want to see the NOTICE
> message for every scan. Unlike COPY FROM, scanning a file via file_fdw
> could be frequent. An alternative idea of place to write the
> information of the number of malformed rows would be the EXPLAIN
> command as follow:

Yeah, I also have some concerns regarding the noise that this could
produce if called on a foreign table on a regular basis. The verbose
mode is disabled by default so I don't see why we should not allow it
if the relation owner wants to show it.

Perhaps we should first do a silence mode for log_verbosity to skip
the NOTICE produced at the end of the COPY FROM summarizing the whole?
It would be confusing to have different defaults between COPY and
file_fdw, but having the option to silence that completely is also
appealing from the user point of view.

> QUERY PLAN
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Foreign Scan on public.test (cost=0.00..1.10 rows=1 width=12)
> Output: a, b, c
> Foreign File: test.csv
> Foreign File Size: 12 b
> Skipped Rows: 10

Interesting idea linked to the idea of pushing the error state to
something else than the logs. Sounds like a separate feature.

> IIUC we have to execute ALTER FOREIGN TABLE to change the
> log_verbosity value and which requires to be the owner. Which seems
> not to be user-friendly.

I am not sure about allowing scans to force an option to be a
different thing at runtime vs what's been defined in the relation
itself with CREATE/ALTER.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-07-23 00:17:18 Re: Add privileges test for pg_stat_statements to improve coverage
Previous Message Peter Smith 2024-07-22 23:23:45 Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns