| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping |
| Date: | 2024-07-22 21:36:33 |
| Message-ID: | Zp7Q4erYWVjtWzQr@nathan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 05:20:15PM -0400, Joseph Koshakow wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:17 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>> Am I understanding correctly that the main
>> behavioral difference between these two approaches is that users will see
>> different error messages?
>
> Yes, you are understanding correctly. The approach written above will
> have the error message "array upper bound is too large", while the
> approach attached in patch
> v13-0002-Remove-overflow-from-array_set_slice.patch will have the error
> message "array lower bound is too large".
Okay. I'll plan on committing v13-0002 in the next couple of days, then.
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Isaac Morland | 2024-07-22 21:40:55 | Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-07-22 21:33:57 | Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL |