Re: 回复:Re: 回复:Re: speed up pg_upgrade with large number of tables

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: 杨伯宇(长堂) <yangboyu(dot)yby(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 回复:Re: 回复:Re: speed up pg_upgrade with large number of tables
Date: 2024-07-08 14:37:04
Message-ID: Zov5kHbEyDMuHJI_@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 03:22:36PM +0800, 杨伯宇(长堂) wrote:
> Besides, https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4995/ seems insufficient to
> this situation. Some time-consuming functions like check_for_data_types_usage
> are not yet able to run in parallel. But these patches could be a great
> starting point for a more efficient parallelism implementation. Maybe we can
> do it later.

I actually just wrote up the first version of the patch for parallelizing
the data type checks over the weekend. I'll post it shortly.

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2024-07-08 14:40:30 Re: 回复: An implementation of multi-key sort
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-07-08 14:17:49 Re: Injection point locking