| From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions |
| Date: | 2024-06-25 09:18:25 |
| Message-ID: | ZnqLYcAYTv3fKBmU@msg.df7cb.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Nathan Bossart
> At first glance, the general idea seems reasonable to me. I'm wondering
> whether there is a requirement for this directory to be prepended or if it
> could be appended to the end. That way, the existing ones would take
> priority, which might be desirable from a security standpoint.
My use case for this is to test things at compile time (where I can't
write to /usr/share/postgresql/). If installed things would take
priority over the things that I'm trying to test, I'd be disappointed.
Christoph
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2024-06-25 09:28:03 | Re: Partial aggregates pushdown |
| Previous Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2024-06-25 09:11:16 | RE: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR |