Re: Injection point locking

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Injection point locking
Date: 2024-06-25 02:14:57
Message-ID: ZnooIUV80QzWFhbT@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 01:29:38PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> InjectionPointRun() acquires InjectionPointLock, looks up the hash entry,
> and releases the lock:
>
> > LWLockAcquire(InjectionPointLock, LW_SHARED);
> > entry_by_name = (InjectionPointEntry *)
> > hash_search(InjectionPointHash, name,
> > HASH_FIND, &found);
> > LWLockRelease(InjectionPointLock);
>
> Later, it reads fields from the entry it looked up:
>
> > /* not found in local cache, so load and register */
> > snprintf(path, MAXPGPATH, "%s/%s%s", pkglib_path,
> > entry_by_name->library, DLSUFFIX);
>
> Isn't that a straightforward race condition, if the injection point is
> detached in between?

This is a feature, not a bug :)

Jokes apart, this is a behavior that Noah was looking for so as it is
possible to detach a point to emulate what a debugger would do with a
breakpoint for some of his tests with concurrent DDL bugs, so not
taking a lock while running a point is important. It's true, though,
that we could always delay the LWLock release once the local cache is
loaded, but would it really matter?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-06-25 02:15:45 Re: [PATCH] Fix type redefinition build errors with macOS SDK 15.0
Previous Message Noah Misch 2024-06-25 02:09:52 Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin