Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17
Date: 2024-06-21 15:46:56
Message-ID: ZnWgcPK7Gm0WUuyA@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 11:37:54AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The release notes have this item:
>
> Allow specification of physical standbys that must be synchronized
> before they are visible to subscribers (Hou Zhijie, Shveta Malik)
>
> The new server variable is standby_slot_names.
>
> Is standby_slot_names an accurate name for this GUC? It seems too
> generic.

+1, I was considering bringing this up, too. I'm still thinking of
alternate names to propose, though.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-06-21 15:54:50 Re: cfbot update: Using GitHub for patch review
Previous Message Dave Page 2024-06-21 15:46:06 Re: Meson far from ready on Windows