From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | P C <puravc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Smith, Travis" <Travis(dot)Smith(at)circana(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BDR that performs |
Date: | 2024-06-14 14:57:19 |
Message-ID: | ZmxaT4od9xIs9itP@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 06:11:53PM +0530, P C wrote:
> Hello Travis,
>
> We have had this requirement (true BDR that also handles DDLs & Conflict
> Resolution) and have been researching the options for a long time and I'll send
> you more details soon, but meanwhile curious to understand why EDB BDR is not
> an option?
I agree pgEdge is worth considering:
https://www.pgedge.com/products/pgedge-platform
and perhaps EDB BDR/PGD was not being considered due to cost.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julius Tuskenis | 2024-06-17 09:35:02 | performance of sql and plpgsql functions |
Previous Message | P C | 2024-06-14 12:41:53 | Re: BDR that performs |