Re: BDR that performs

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: P C <puravc(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Smith, Travis" <Travis(dot)Smith(at)circana(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BDR that performs
Date: 2024-06-14 14:57:19
Message-ID: ZmxaT4od9xIs9itP@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 06:11:53PM +0530, P C wrote:
> Hello Travis,
>
> We have had this requirement (true BDR that also handles DDLs & Conflict
> Resolution) and have been researching the options for a long time and I'll send
> you more details soon, but meanwhile curious to understand why EDB BDR is not
> an option?

I agree pgEdge is worth considering:

https://www.pgedge.com/products/pgedge-platform

and perhaps EDB BDR/PGD was not being considered due to cost.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julius Tuskenis 2024-06-17 09:35:02 performance of sql and plpgsql functions
Previous Message P C 2024-06-14 12:41:53 Re: BDR that performs