Re: Revive num_dead_tuples column of pg_stat_progress_vacuum

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Revive num_dead_tuples column of pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Date: 2024-06-14 00:41:37
Message-ID: ZmuRwdv74jkjkDGo@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:38:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I was about to push the patch but let me confirm just in case: is it
>> okay to bump the catversion even after post-beta1?
>
> Yes, that happens somewhat routinely.

Up to RC, even after beta2. This happens routinely every year because
tweaks are always required for what got committed. And that's OK to
do so now.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2024-06-14 00:49:43 Re: Changing default -march landscape
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-06-14 00:38:05 Re: Revive num_dead_tuples column of pg_stat_progress_vacuum