Re: BUG #18499: Reindexing spgist index concurrently triggers Assert("TransactionIdIsValid(state->myXid)")

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18499: Reindexing spgist index concurrently triggers Assert("TransactionIdIsValid(state->myXid)")
Date: 2024-06-16 23:24:10
Message-ID: Zm90GkbGq16gjJy0@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 06:52:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, a different line of attack could be to not generate redirects
> at all during REINDEX CONCURRENTLY: on the basis of this argument,
> we don't need them. So that would look roughly similar to the tests
> that skip making redirects when isBuild is true, and it'd allow
> keeping the assertion in spgFormDeadTuple, and it'd save some
> usually-trifling amount of work in the next VACUUM. However, I'm
> not sure there's a nice way for spginsert() to know whether it's
> being invoked in REINDEX CONCURRENTLY or a normal INSERT/UPDATE
> query. Can we trust indexInfo->ii_Concurrent for that?

I am not sure to understand the redirection part for spgist, but
except if I am missing something, we already rely on ii_Concurrent for
other index AMs like BRIN paths to check if we are dealing with a
concurrent build path or not. index_concurrently_build() is used
by both CIC and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY, where the flag is set after a
BuildIndexInfo().
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-06-16 23:28:10 Re: error "can only drop stats once" brings down database
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-06-16 22:52:52 Re: BUG #18499: Reindexing spgist index concurrently triggers Assert("TransactionIdIsValid(state->myXid)")