Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Date: 2024-05-26 03:41:48
Message-ID: ZlKvfKhWOz7CVJC7@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:23:29AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2024-05-22 18:33:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:40:28AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2024-05-18 11:13:54 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I agree keeping things reasonably short is important. But I don't think you're
> > > evenly applying it as a goal.
> > >
> > > Just skimming the notes from the end, I see
> > > - an 8 entries long pg_stat_statements section
> >
> > What item did you want to remove? Those are all user-visible changes.
>
> My point here was not that we necessarily need to remove those, but that their
> impact to users is smaller than many of the performance impacts you disregard.

I liked all your detailed suggestions so applied the attached patch.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

Attachment Content-Type Size
master.diff text/x-diff 5.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2024-05-26 03:49:03 Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2024-05-26 02:10:36 Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes