Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs
Date: 2024-06-03 17:18:21
Message-ID: Zl363er4TUbOkJEf@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 11:15:14PM +0000, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
>> Any concerns with doing something like this [0] for the back-branches? The
>> constant would be 6 instead of 7 on v14 through v16.
>
> As far as backpatching the present inconsistencies in the docs,
> [0] looks good to me.

Committed.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-06-03 17:20:22 Re: pgsql: Add more SQL/JSON constructor functions
Previous Message walther 2024-06-03 17:11:14 Re: Build with LTO / -flto on macOS