| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Luc Vlaming <luc(at)swarm64(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Introduce new multi insert Table AM and improve performance of various SQL commands with it for Heap AM |
| Date: | 2024-05-15 23:07:11 |
| Message-ID: | ZkVAH2MJg7eJFS52@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 11:14:14AM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> We don't use IAM anywhere, for example (it's always "index AM"), and I
> don't think we'd turn "sequence AM" into SAM either, would we?
SAM is not a term I've seen used for sequence AMs in the past, I don't
intend to use it. TAM is similar strange to me, but perhaps it's just
because I am used to table AMs as a whole.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-05-15 23:11:11 | Re: Underscore in positional parameters? |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2024-05-15 22:43:06 | Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop? |