| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Weird test mixup |
| Date: | 2024-05-04 09:49:17 |
| Message-ID: | ZjYEnWHqf-9_opVC@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 01:52:20PM +0500, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> As far as I understand this will effectively forbid calling
> injection_points_detach() for local injection point of other
> backend. Do I get it right?
Yes, that would be the intention. Noah has other use cases in mind
with this interface that I did not think about supporting, hence he's
objecting to this restriction.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-05-04 13:16:19 | Re: On disable_cost |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-05-04 09:47:22 | Re: pg_sequence_last_value() for unlogged sequences on standbys |