Re: PERIOD foreign key feature

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PERIOD foreign key feature
Date: 2024-05-09 20:34:21
Message-ID: Zj0zTQC2unHX4b4r@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 08:47:45PM -0700, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
> On 5/8/24 07:44, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > Yes, David is correct here on all points. I like his suggestion to
> > > > clarify the language here also. If you need a patch from me let me know,
> > > > but I assume it's something a committer can just make happen?
> > >
> > > In principle yes, but it's also very helpful if someone produces an actual
> > > patch file, with complete commit message, credits, mailing list link, etc.
> >
> > I am ready to do the work, but waited a day for Peter to reply, since he
> > was the author of the text.
>
> Here is a patch for this.

Thanks, patch applied.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2024-05-09 20:35:54 Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2024-05-09 20:32:08 Re: partitioning and identity column